Find answers, ask questions, and connect with our
community around the world.

Forums Forums General Chat ‘Checks Wallet.. Again’

  • ‘Checks Wallet.. Again’

  • Richard A Thackeray

    Member
    22 September 2014 at 12:53 pm

    I’ve always liked 101Fc’s, & when a friend had one in the mid-90’s, it did nothing to dent my enthusiasm for them

    Various companies/individuals have re-engineered them over the years, to incorporate diesel engines, power-steering, coli-suspension.

    (mainly with a new chassis, as the main-rails are completely straight, & could have all the top-rails, cross-members & body-mounts welded on)

    Heck!!, even Land Rover themselves, offered to retro-fit the British Armys fleet (with the Tdi), when the tender went out that saw the Army buying Pinzgauers

    I was notified of this one, via a link on my FaceBook page

    http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/LAND-ROVER-101-Forward-Control-coil-sprung-2-8-TD-1975-12-Mnths-MOT-/121441155915

    Mmm, very tempting…………..

  • Gunner

    Member
    22 September 2014 at 5:51 pm

    Awesome. 😯

  • KTM540

    Member
    22 September 2014 at 6:49 pm

    now thats a bit of kit (and prolly the only Landy I’d consider 😆 )

    I new a guy who had a mint one with a Rover V8, that he used in a bit of woodland he owned 😯

  • Richard A Thackeray

    Member
    22 September 2014 at 7:40 pm

    They’re not that big really

    They’re shorter & almost as narrow as a (proper; 1970-1995) Range Rover

    Length;

    101FC = 14′ 2″

    RR = 15′ 3″

    Width;

    101FC = 6′ 0″

    RR = 5′ 10″ (neither including mirrors)

    Height;

    101FC = 7′ 0″ (to highest point of canvas)

    RR = 6′ 0″

Viewing 1 - 4 of 4 posts
Original Post
0 of 0 posts June 2018
Now

New Report

Close